Welcome
PPM

Abstract

 
  Search

 


 

 

 






Feedback and Response Regarding ACOEM's Practice Guidelines

Editor’s note: In the interest of dialogue on a controversial subject, we present here comments by the Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome Association (RSDSA) regarding the upcoming publication of the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine’s (ACOEM) Practice Guidelines followed by the response of the ACOEM Guidelines Oversight Committee.


RSDSA Comments on ACOEM’s Practice Guidelines

In 2010, the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) will be publishing the third edition of Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines: Evaluation and Management of Common Health Problems and Functional Recovery in Workers. The guidelines, according to ACOEM, are intended to help improve or restore the health of those workers who incur occupationally-related illness or injuries and are the only “evidence-based guidelines that focus on returning employees to work within 90 days of an injury or illness.”

Nevertheless, there is a lot of concern among members of the RSDSA Board of Directors on how these guidelines affect people with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Peter Moskovitz, MD, submitted the following comments to the ACOEM on behalf of the board:

The Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome Association (RSDSA), as a not-for-profit organization dedicated to the awareness, education, advocacy, and research for CRPS, also known as reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD), would like to make the following comments on the American College of Environmental and Occupational Medicine Guidelines.

Response from ACOEM Oversight Committee

In the preceding commentary, the Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome Association (RSDSA) explored the possible effect of ACOEM’s practice guidelines on medical decision-making and on the utilization review process as they might affect patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS).

RSDSA raised questions about ACOEM’s guidelines process and urged it to recognize and affirm certain fundamental principles, including: The predominant ethical obligation of the practitioner is to the individual patient; each patient may choose a physician or treatment team; CRPS patients need to obtain an individually-designed treatment plan for their debilitating physical and psychological conditions; and that normative recommendations are educational and help to rank potential diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, but they are not prescriptive.

Background
Medical practice guidelines provide a framework for consistent and reliable decision-making regarding the diagnosis, management and treatment of injury and illness. Many organizations publish guidelines, ranging from medical specialty societies to private health companies. The potential for improved health care as a result makes this effort important and worthwhile.

Please refer to the March 2010 issue for the complete text. In the event you need to order a back issue, please click here.

— March 2010

The full article is now available as a PDF and may be
purchased for $5 and downloaded immediately:
Order Now


©2007 Copyright. PPM Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.